Hauntingly Imperfect
April212014
50shadesofacceptance:

I will not stop reblogging this because this shit was both hilarious and true

50shadesofacceptance:

I will not stop reblogging this because this shit was both hilarious and true

(Source: onlysheepfollowpeople, via obamasgirlfriend)

April22014

Procrastination

It’s almost 10:30pm and I’m a paragraph and a half into a 4-6 page paper due tomorrow. 

March312014
9PM

NONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

8PM

paradise-joshutch:

OMG THERE IS ONLY 10 MINS LEFT GUYS OMFG

ALSO THIS.

8PM

I THOUGHT THIS SHOW WAS A COMEDY

hummingbirds-and-champagne:

(It will cheer up soon, yes?)

THIS TOO.

8PM

veinss:

THEY SPEND AN ENTIRE SEASON FOCUSED AROUND THEIR WEDDING ONLY TO DIVORCE THEM ARE YOU FUCKIN KIDDING ME

THIS

March202014
March192014

Ever look at a bird and wonder what life would be like if it were a pterodactyl.

2PM

I wouldn’t mind, but splitting children’s books strictly along gender lines is not even good publishing. Just like other successful children’s books, The Hunger Games was not aimed at girls or boys; like JK Rowling, Roald Dahl, Robert Muchamore and others, Collins just wrote great stories, and readers bought them in their millions. Now, Dahl’s Matilda is published with a pink cover, and I have heard one bookseller report seeing a mother snatching a copy from her small son’s hands saying “That’s for girls” as she replaced it on the shelf.

You see, it is not just girls’ ambitions that are being frustrated by the limiting effects of “books for girls”, in which girls’ roles are all passive, domestic and in front of a mirror. Rebecca Davies, who writes the children’s books blog at Independent.co.uk, tells me that she is equally sick of receiving “books which have been commissioned solely for the purpose of ‘getting boys reading’ [and which have] all-male characters and thin, action-based plots.” What we are doing by pigeon-holing children is badly letting them down. And books, above all things, should be available to any child who is interested in them.

Happily, as the literary editor of The Independent on Sunday, there is something that I can do about this. So I promise now that the newspaper and this website will not be reviewing any book which is explicitly aimed at just girls, or just boys. Nor will The Independent’s books section. And nor will the children’s books blog at Independent.co.uk. Any Girls’ Book of Boring Princesses that crosses my desk will go straight into the recycling pile along with every Great Big Book of Snot for Boys. If you are a publisher with enough faith in your new book that you think it will appeal to all children, we’ll be very happy to hear from you. But the next Harry Potter or Katniss Everdeen will not come in glittery pink covers. So we’d thank you not to send us such books at all.

Gender-specific books demean all our children. So the Independent on Sunday will no longer review anything marketed to exclude either sex - Comment - Voices - The Independent

AMAZE!

(via thebooksmith)

(via girlwithalessonplan)

← Older entries Page 1 of 11